Packaging has always done two jobs for consumer goods: it protects products on their way to buyers and gives a brand its visible identity. Yet once a purchase is unpacked, the leftover material becomes a cost, and for years that cost fell largely on local councils and taxpayers.
UK packaging policy now places that cost with the businesses that put packaging on the market. For small brands, this means packaging choices carry regulatory weight alongside their commercial role, so growth planning includes knowing where the rules begin.
How the UK Defines a Packaging Producer
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging applies across the UK under the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024. An organisation must act when it has an annual turnover of £1 million or more and was responsible for more than 25 tonnes of packaging in the previous calendar year.
The activities covered are broad. They include supplying packaged goods under a brand name, importing packaged products and owning an online marketplace. Because a brand can be any name, trademark, or distinguishing mark, a business that outsources manufacturing can still be responsible.
The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs sets out the thresholds and activities in its guidance on extended producer responsibility for packaging. The guidance also explains how group companies and subsidiaries should calculate their totals.
What the Rules Ask of Smaller Producers
Obligations differ depending on whether a business is classed as small or large. A small producer has Obligations differ depending on whether a business is classed as small or large. A small producer has an annual turnover above £1 million and up to £2 million with more than 25 tonnes of packaging, or a turnover above £1 million with between 25 and 50 tonnes. A large producer, by contrast, meets both upper limits, with a turnover of £2 million or more and responsibility for more than 50 tonnes of packaging a year.
These classifications are not fixed, since a growing brand can move from small to large as its sales and packaging volumes increase. If a business later falls below the thresholds or stops packaging, it must notify environmental regulators within 28 days.
Small producers register, pay an annual registration fee and report their packaging data once a year. Large producers, by contrast, report every six months, pay waste disposal fees, and obtain packaging waste recycling notes to meet recycling obligations, so the administrative load rises sharply as a brand grows past those thresholds.
Separately, the Plastic Packaging Tax applies to businesses that manufacture or import 10 tonnes or more of plastic packaging within 12 months, where that packaging contains less than 30% recycled plastic. Brands below the EPR thresholds can still feel packaging costs, since suppliers can pass them down the supply chain.
Packaging Decisions Within a Small Brand’s Control
EPR fees are linked to recyclability, and government guidance confirms that easier-to-recycle packaging attracts a lower fee. Small producers do not yet pay disposal fees. Designing for recyclability also prepares them for growth and limits their exposure to supplier-passed charges.
With those pressures in mind, smaller firms can consider and gradually introduce the following adjustments.
Choosing Single-Material Packaging
Single-material packaging, such as a cardboard box sealed with paper tape, is easier for recycling facilities to process. Mixed materials bonded together, like plastic-lined cardboard, can be harder to separate. As a result, they may score lower in recyclability assessments and attract higher fees as a brand grows.
Reducing Secondary Packaging
Outer boxes, inserts and protective fillers add weight to every shipment. Because EPR obligations are calculated by tonnage, trimming these layers lowers the volume a brand must record and report. It can also reduce postage costs, since lighter parcels may fall into lower courier price bands.
Consolidating Product Into Fewer Containers
Selling a larger volume in one container reduces the number of separate units entering the waste stream. The vaping sector offers one example, because UK rules cap nicotine-containing refill bottles at 10ml, while nicotine-free shortfill e-liquids can be sold in larger, partly filled bottles with space for a nicotine shot. The answer to what is shortfill e-liquid is therefore partly a packaging one, and with shortfills explained this way, a 50ml shortfill e-liquid in a 60ml bottle replaces six separate 10ml refills.
Keeping Supplier Records Organised
EPR reporting requires data on packaging material, weight, class and type, so accurate records start with suppliers. Requesting material specifications and unit weights at the point of ordering saves time when reporting deadlines loom. Compliance schemes on the government’s public register can also handle registration and data submissions on a producer’s behalf.
Packaging Built for Recovery Grows Well With a Brand
Packaging specifications have a long lifespan, because print runs, custom moulds and supplier contracts are costly to change once committed. A small brand that settles on lighter, recyclable materials early avoids redesigning its range when it crosses a compliance threshold.
The regulations also continue to develop, and recyclability assessments and fee modulation are designed to reward better packaging design over time. Brands that treat packaging as part of product development, not just a shipping necessity, are well placed to absorb those changes without disruption.
Photo Credit: Pexels.
